Few
recent questions in the Acute Kidney Injury in Nephsap 2011 suggest ANP as an
option for preventing AKI in certain surgical setting. Early animal data had
shown promise. The first study to look at human data was in transplant
patients showing negative results. Similar
study was done in more transplant patients showing more negative results.
What is the data for benefit?
Earlier
studies might have been promising but the recent data is discouraging. A NEJM
study in 1997 showed that it was beneficial in oliguric patients with ATN and
showed a potential promise for a treatment for ATN. Another
study showed benefit in post cardiac surgery patients in a
randomized trial. Despite the large size of the trial, ANP administration
had no effect on 21-day dialysis-free survival, mortality, or change in plasma
creatinine concentration. A Cochrane
review recently suggested perhaps some benefit. Nineteen studies (11 prevention, 8 treatment; 1,861
participants) were included. There was no difference in mortality between ANP and control in either the low or high dose
prevention studies. After major surgery there was a significant reduction in
RRT requirement with ANP in the
prevention studies, but not in the treatment studies. There was no difference
in mortality between ANP and
control in either the prevention or treatment studies. There was a reduced need
for RRT with low dose ANP in
patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. ANP was not associated with outcome improvement in
either radio contrast nephropathy or oliguric AKI. A review in CJASN by the same authors and similar
analysis suggests no benefit. Thus, although subset analyses separating low-dose from
high-dose ANP trials suggest potential benefits, the preponderance of the
literature suggests no benefit of ANP therapy for AKI. The side effects
of potential hypotension and harm associated with the use of a
vasodilator in high-risk perioperative and ICU patients, and a low value on potential benefit which
is supported by relatively low-quality evidence from retrospective subset
analyses from negative multicenter trials made KDIGO not recommend this treatment.
KDIGO guidelines on ANP and AKI from 2012 read as follows: “Several
natriuretic peptides are in clinical use or in development for
treatment of congestive heart failure, (CHF) or renal dysfunction, and
could potentially be useful to prevent or treat AKI. Atrial natriuretic
peptide (ANP) is a 28-amino-acid peptide with diuretic, natriuretic, and
vasodilatory activity. ANP is mainly produced in atrial myocytes, and the rate
of release from the atrium increases in response to atrial stretch. Early
animal studies showed that ANP decreases preglomerular vascular resistance and
increases postglomerular vascular resistance, leading to increased GFR. It also
inhibits renal tubular sodium reabsorption. Increases in GFR and diuresis
have also been confirmed in clinical studies. It could thus be expected that ANP
might be useful for treatment of AKI, and several RCTs have been conducted to
test this hypothesis. 3.5.3: We suggest not using atrial natriuretic
peptide (ANP) to prevent (2C) or treat (2B) AKI."
No comments:
Post a Comment