A recent study published in a non nephrology journal highlights a critical point that is
often missed by nephrologists. Although there is data coming out from prior
studies that conservative management might be better for certain groups of
patients then offering dialysis, more studies need to confirm this. This study
is a retrospective observational study that looked at conservative management
vs offering dialysis.
Some key points
1. The renal replacement therapy group survived for longer
when survival was taken from the time estimated glomerular filtration rate at
different GFRs.
2. When factors influencing survival were stratified for both groups independently, renal replacement therapy failed to show a survival advantage over conservative management, in patients older than 80 years or with a World Health Organization performance score of 3 or more.
2. When factors influencing survival were stratified for both groups independently, renal replacement therapy failed to show a survival advantage over conservative management, in patients older than 80 years or with a World Health Organization performance score of 3 or more.
3. Acute hospitalizations were more in the RRT arm
4.Seventy-six percent of the conservative management group
accessed community palliative care services compared to 0% of renal replacement
therapy patients ( THIS is a striking number).
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nep.12064/abstract
ASN had a series of videos on this topic as well.
Finally, a nice blog post on GeriPal on this topic on HD patients.
ASN had a series of videos on this topic as well.
Finally, a nice blog post on GeriPal on this topic on HD patients.
Image source: www.gloryhpc.com
No comments:
Post a Comment