Hypertension in dialysis patients is hard to manage. In over
90% of the cases, the cause of volume. Salt and water intake and inability for
fluid removal remains the most like cause of HTN in ESRD. Few cases are renin
mediated as well. Which anti
hypertensive medications have the best effect in the few cases of HTN that is
not treated with volume removal?
ACEI/ARB would be the most obvious choice. Randomized trials in non ESRD
hypertensive patients have shown that LVH is significantly improved and
preventing cardiac morbidity and mortality with ACEI/ARBs compared to Beta
Blockers. A recent study in NDT 2014
by Agarwal et al. was a randomized trial of atenolol and lisinopril in ESRD
patients(HDPAL).
Results:
1.
Monthly blood pressures were higher in ACEI
group after initiation of therapy
2.
More serious cardiovascular events occurred in
ACEI group compared to the atenolol group
3.
All cause hospitalizations were higher in ACEI
group as well
4.
Finally, LVH had improvement equally in both
groups
5.
These results hold most true for black patients.
Some interesting points:
1.
This is the first study to look at head to head
drug comparison in ESRD patients with BP management
2.
Counter to what may have shown in non ESRD
patients, this study showed that atenolol was better.
3.
Atenolol is renally cleared of all the beta
blockers and number of patients that are non anuric might matter as it might
have had more clearance and less of a heart rate effect. Interestingly, that
variable was well matched as well.
4.
Although not sure of significance, less atenolol
patients had coronary artery disease and significant number of them had re vascularization
procedures. This may be a big weakness as going into the study, there were less
sicker patients in the ACEI arm from a cardiac perspective.
5.
But to counter balance that, there were more
males in the atenolol arm compared to ACEI arm
6.
Increased fractures were noted with atenolol
arm- perhaps again getting into the renal clearance effect perhaps and effect
on heart rate and causing blocks
7.
There was no placebo arm and most patients were
black – perhaps hard then to generalize to all races.
8.
Using BP monitoring interdialytic ambulatory BP
monitors was a strength
9.
Interestingly, it says at the end of the
manuscript: received for publication Dec 2nd 2013 and accepted in
revised form on Dec 4th 2013.
That is strange that a paper can get peer reviewed, revised and gotten
back for accepted form in 2 days. Hopefully that was a typo.
No comments:
Post a Comment